Importers of HS 8544.42 (other) from Vietnam actually paid 23.1% on the taxed portion of the value in 2026-06 — 22.2% across everything shipped, taxed or not. Measured from official duty receipts, not the rulebook: the statutory MFN base rate on this code is 2.6%. Over the window the rate on the taxed portion moved 2.6% → 23.1%, with the largest single step +12.7pp in 2025-08. Measured from official US duty receipts · as-of 2026-06 · confidence: measured, not modelled. The HTS base rate is 2.6% — importers actually paid 23.1%, so the trade-war overlay added 20.5 pts, measured at the border (not a summed rulebook estimate). Reproduce exactly: tariff_story(hs: "8544.42", origin: "Vietnam") · see it at trimtabist.com/tariffs
HS 8544.42. The schedule base rate is 2.6%; importers from Vietnam actually paid 23.1% on the dutiable value in 2026-06 — the trade-war overlay added 20.5 points, measured at the border. Measured, not modelled.
Over the window the collected rate moved 2.6% (2023-07) → 23.1% (2026-06), largest single step +12.7pp in 2025-08.
Vietnam's lower duty (22.2% vs 45.51%) lets it price up to 19.1% above China at the factory and still match on duty-inclusive customs cost. But on the LATEST measured prices, Vietnam actually lands cheaper — $16.48/kg vs $17.94/kg (duty in, freight out).
2 Chapter-99 measures name Vietnam; scope mapping is partial (several annexes are PDFs) — absence never means exemption. They do not sum, and some are product-specific — the collected rate above is the composed truth.
All goods from Vietnam · the whole tariff ledger · 7 CBP rulings cite this code · reproduce: tariff_story(hs: "8544.42", origin: "Vietnam") via /connect. Not customs or legal advice.