Importers of HS 8502.11 (of an output not exceeding 75 kva) from Japan actually paid 10.3% on the taxed portion of the value in 2026-06 — 10.3% across everything shipped, taxed or not. Measured from official duty receipts, not the rulebook: the statutory MFN base rate on this code is 2.5%. Over the window the rate on the taxed portion moved 2.5% → 10.3%, with the largest single step -5.1pp in 2026-02. Measured from official US duty receipts · as-of 2026-06 · confidence: measured, not modelled. The HTS base rate is 2.5% — importers actually paid 10.3%, so the trade-war overlay added 7.8 pts, measured at the border (not a summed rulebook estimate). Reproduce exactly: tariff_story(hs: "8502.11", origin: "Japan") · see it at trimtabist.com/tariffs
HS 8502.11. The schedule base rate is 2.5%; importers from Japan actually paid 10.3% on the dutiable value in 2026-06 — the trade-war overlay added 7.8 points, measured at the border. Measured, not modelled.
Over the window the collected rate moved 2.5% (2023-07) → 10.3% (2026-06), largest single step -5.1pp in 2026-02.
Japan's lower duty (10.3% vs 37.5%) lets it price up to 24.7% above China at the factory and still match on duty-inclusive customs cost. But on the LATEST measured prices, China actually lands cheaper — $4.33/kg vs $15.08/kg (duty in, freight out).
14 Chapter-99 measures name Japan; scope mapping is partial (several annexes are PDFs) — absence never means exemption. They do not sum, and some are product-specific — the collected rate above is the composed truth.
All goods from Japan · the whole tariff ledger · 1 CBP ruling cite this code · reproduce: tariff_story(hs: "8502.11", origin: "Japan") via /connect. Not customs or legal advice.