Importers of HS 7307.92 (other) from India actually paid 50.58% on the taxed portion of the value in 2026-06 — 50.58% across everything shipped, taxed or not. Measured from official duty receipts, not the rulebook: the statutory MFN base rate on this code is 6.2%. Over the window the rate on the taxed portion moved 6.2% → 50.58%, with the largest single step +16.3pp in 2025-03. Measured from official US duty receipts · as-of 2026-06 · confidence: measured, not modelled. The HTS base rate is 6.2% — importers actually paid 50.58%, so the trade-war overlay added 44.4 pts, measured at the border (not a summed rulebook estimate). Reproduce exactly: tariff_story(hs: "7307.92", origin: "India") · see it at trimtabist.com/tariffs
HS 7307.92. The schedule base rate is 6.2%; importers from India actually paid 50.58% on the dutiable value in 2026-06 — the trade-war overlay added 44.4 points, measured at the border. Measured, not modelled.
Over the window the collected rate moved 6.2% (2023-07) → 50.58% (2026-06), largest single step +16.3pp in 2025-03.
India's lower duty (50.58% vs 76.5%) lets it price up to 17.2% above China at the factory and still match on duty-inclusive customs cost. But on the LATEST measured prices, China actually lands cheaper — $2.37/kg vs $3.82/kg (duty in, freight out).
15 Chapter-99 measures name India; scope mapping is partial (several annexes are PDFs) — absence never means exemption. They do not sum, and some are product-specific — the collected rate above is the composed truth.
All goods from India · the whole tariff ledger · 2 CBP rulings cite this code · reproduce: tariff_story(hs: "7307.92", origin: "India") via /connect. Not customs or legal advice.