Importers of HS 6909.12 (articles having a hardness equivalent to 9 or more on the mo) from Japan actually paid 14% on the taxed portion of the value in 2026-06 — 13.94% across everything shipped, taxed or not. Measured from official duty receipts, not the rulebook: the statutory MFN base rate on this code is 4%. Over the window the rate on the taxed portion moved 4% → 14%, with the largest single step +8.3pp in 2025-05. Measured from official US duty receipts · as-of 2026-06 · confidence: measured, not modelled. The HTS base rate is 4% — importers actually paid 14%, so the trade-war overlay added 10 pts, measured at the border (not a summed rulebook estimate). Reproduce exactly: tariff_story(hs: "6909.12", origin: "Japan") · see it at trimtabist.com/tariffs
HS 6909.12. The schedule base rate is 4%; importers from Japan actually paid 14% on the dutiable value in 2026-06 — the trade-war overlay added 10 points, measured at the border. Measured, not modelled.
Over the window the collected rate moved 4% (2023-07) → 14% (2026-06), largest single step +8.3pp in 2025-05.
Japan's lower duty (13.94% vs 39%) lets it price up to 22% above China at the factory and still match on duty-inclusive customs cost. But on the LATEST measured prices, China actually lands cheaper — $41.35/kg vs $63.78/kg (duty in, freight out).
12 Chapter-99 measures name Japan; scope mapping is partial (several annexes are PDFs) — absence never means exemption. They do not sum, and some are product-specific — the collected rate above is the composed truth.
All goods from Japan · the whole tariff ledger · reproduce: tariff_story(hs: "6909.12", origin: "Japan") via /connect. Not customs or legal advice.