Importers of HS 5702.99 (woven, but not made on a power-driven loom (369)) from India actually paid 15.31% on the taxed portion of the value in 2026-06 — 15.31% across everything shipped, taxed or not. Measured from official duty receipts, not the rulebook: the statutory MFN base rate on this code is 6.8%. Over the window the rate on the taxed portion moved 4.46% → 15.31%, with the largest single step -22.1pp in 2026-02. Measured from official US duty receipts · as-of 2026-06 · confidence: measured, not modelled. The HTS base rate is 6.8% — importers actually paid 15.31%, so the trade-war overlay added 8.5 pts, measured at the border (not a summed rulebook estimate). Reproduce exactly: tariff_story(hs: "5702.99", origin: "India") · see it at trimtabist.com/tariffs
HS 5702.99. The schedule base rate is 6.8%; importers from India actually paid 15.31% on the dutiable value in 2026-06 — the trade-war overlay added 8.5 points, measured at the border. Measured, not modelled.
Over the window the collected rate moved 4.46% (2023-07) → 15.31% (2026-06), largest single step -22.1pp in 2026-02.
India's lower duty (15.31% vs 37.8%) lets it price up to 19.5% above China at the factory and still match on duty-inclusive customs cost. But on the LATEST measured prices, China actually lands cheaper — $3.32/kg vs $6/kg (duty in, freight out).
7 Chapter-99 measures name India; scope mapping is partial (several annexes are PDFs) — absence never means exemption. They do not sum, and some are product-specific — the collected rate above is the composed truth.
All goods from India · the whole tariff ledger · reproduce: tariff_story(hs: "5702.99", origin: "India") via /connect. Not customs or legal advice.