Importers of HS 2932.99 (products described in additional u.s. note 3 to section vi) from India actually paid 12.73% on the taxed portion of the value in 2026-06 — 9.88% across everything shipped, taxed or not. Measured from official duty receipts, not the rulebook: the statutory MFN base rate on this code is 6.5%. Over the window the rate on the taxed portion moved 5.19% → 12.73%, with the largest single step -47pp in 2026-02. Measured from official US duty receipts · as-of 2026-06 · confidence: measured, not modelled. The HTS base rate is 6.5% — importers actually paid 12.73%, so the trade-war overlay added 6.2 pts, measured at the border (not a summed rulebook estimate). Reproduce exactly: tariff_story(hs: "2932.99", origin: "India") · see it at trimtabist.com/tariffs
HS 2932.99. The schedule base rate is 6.5%; importers from India actually paid 12.73% on the dutiable value in 2026-06 — the trade-war overlay added 6.2 points, measured at the border. Measured, not modelled.
Over the window the collected rate moved 5.19% (2023-07) → 12.73% (2026-06), largest single step -47pp in 2026-02.
China's lower duty (4.79% vs 9.88%) lets it price up to 4.9% above India at the factory and still match on duty-inclusive customs cost. But on the LATEST measured prices, China actually lands cheaper — $5.97/kg vs $12.98/kg (duty in, freight out).
7 Chapter-99 measures name India; scope mapping is partial (several annexes are PDFs) — absence never means exemption. They do not sum, and some are product-specific — the collected rate above is the composed truth.
All goods from India · the whole tariff ledger · 1 CBP ruling cite this code · reproduce: tariff_story(hs: "2932.99", origin: "India") via /connect. Not customs or legal advice.