Importers of HS 2921.42 (n,n-dimethylaniline) from India actually paid 0.44% on the taxed portion of the value in 2026-06 — 0.44% across everything shipped, taxed or not. Measured from official duty receipts, not the rulebook: the statutory MFN base rate on this code is 6.5%. Over the window the rate on the taxed portion moved 6.5% → 0.44%, with the largest single step +49.9pp in 2025-10. Measured from official US duty receipts · as-of 2026-06 · confidence: measured, not modelled. The HTS base rate is 6.5% — importers actually paid 0.44%, so the trade-war overlay added -6.1 pts, measured at the border (not a summed rulebook estimate). Reproduce exactly: tariff_story(hs: "2921.42", origin: "India") · see it at trimtabist.com/tariffs
HS 2921.42. The schedule base rate is 6.5%; importers from India actually paid 0.44% on the dutiable value in 2026-06 — the trade-war overlay added -6.1 points, measured at the border. Measured, not modelled.
Over the window the collected rate moved 6.5% (2023-07) → 0.44% (2026-06), largest single step +49.9pp in 2025-10.
India's lower duty (0.44% vs 25.45%) lets it price up to 24.9% above China at the factory and still match on duty-inclusive customs cost. But on the LATEST measured prices, India actually lands cheaper — $3.29/kg vs $58.71/kg (duty in, freight out).
7 Chapter-99 measures name India; scope mapping is partial (several annexes are PDFs) — absence never means exemption. They do not sum, and some are product-specific — the collected rate above is the composed truth.
All goods from India · the whole tariff ledger · reproduce: tariff_story(hs: "2921.42", origin: "India") via /connect. Not customs or legal advice.