Importers of HS 1704.90 (other) from Canada actually paid 11.55% on the taxed portion of the value in 2026-06 — 0.27% across everything shipped, taxed or not. Measured from official duty receipts, not the rulebook: the statutory MFN base rate on this code is 5.6%. Over the window the rate on the taxed portion moved 6.26% → 11.55%, with the largest single step -23.1pp in 2026-02. Measured from official US duty receipts · as-of 2026-06 · confidence: measured, not modelled. The HTS base rate is 5.6% — importers actually paid 11.55%, so the trade-war overlay added 6 pts, measured at the border (not a summed rulebook estimate). Reproduce exactly: tariff_story(hs: "1704.90", origin: "Canada") · see it at trimtabist.com/tariffs
HS 1704.90. The schedule base rate is 5.6%; importers from Canada actually paid 11.55% on the dutiable value in 2026-06 — the trade-war overlay added 6 points, measured at the border. Measured, not modelled.
Over the window the collected rate moved 6.26% (2023-07) → 11.55% (2026-06), largest single step -23.1pp in 2026-02.
Canada's lower duty (0.27% vs 40.55%) lets it price up to 40.2% above China at the factory and still match on duty-inclusive customs cost. But on the LATEST measured prices, China actually lands cheaper — $2.84/kg vs $5.72/kg (duty in, freight out).
7 Chapter-99 measures name Canada; scope mapping is partial (several annexes are PDFs) — absence never means exemption. They do not sum, and some are product-specific — the collected rate above is the composed truth.
All goods from Canada · the whole tariff ledger · 4 CBP rulings cite this code · reproduce: tariff_story(hs: "1704.90", origin: "Canada") via /connect. Not customs or legal advice.