Importers of HS 1302.32 (mucilages and thickeners, whether or not modified, derived f) from India actually paid 9.61% on the taxed portion of the value in 2026-06 — 9.57% across everything shipped, taxed or not. Measured from official duty receipts, not the rulebook: the statutory MFN base rate on this code is Free. Over the window the rate on the taxed portion moved null% → 9.61%, with the largest single step +30.7pp in 2025-10. Measured from official US duty receipts · as-of 2026-06 · confidence: measured, not modelled. The HTS base rate is Free — importers actually paid 9.61%, so the trade-war overlay added 9.6 pts, measured at the border (not a summed rulebook estimate). Reproduce exactly: tariff_story(hs: "1302.32", origin: "India") · see it at trimtabist.com/tariffs
HS 1302.32. The schedule base rate is Free; importers from India actually paid 9.61% on the dutiable value in 2026-06 — the trade-war overlay added 9.6 points, measured at the border. Measured, not modelled.
Over the window the collected rate moved % (2023-07) → 9.61% (2026-06), largest single step +30.7pp in 2025-10.
India's lower duty (9.57% vs 17.5%) lets it price up to 7.2% above China at the factory and still match on duty-inclusive customs cost. But on the LATEST measured prices, India actually lands cheaper — $1.87/kg vs $8.82/kg (duty in, freight out).
7 Chapter-99 measures name India; scope mapping is partial (several annexes are PDFs) — absence never means exemption. They do not sum, and some are product-specific — the collected rate above is the composed truth.
All goods from India · the whole tariff ledger · reproduce: tariff_story(hs: "1302.32", origin: "India") via /connect. Not customs or legal advice.